In the first ten months of this year, the Department of Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court (Senate) annulled or amended rulings of first instance courts and courts of appeal in more than half of cases examined. Furthermore, in two out of five annulled or modified rulings (38%) the errors in application of a punishment have been found as shows the statistics of the Supreme Court.
Pašvaldības rīcības brīvība autonomo funkciju organizēšanā; Pašvaldības lēmuma par nekustamā īpašuma nodošanas bezatlīdzības lietošanā izbeigšanu izvērtējums
Jauna sprieduma taisīšana apelācijas instances tiesā
Vienošanās protokolā paredzētā soda mēra precizēšana
Apdrošinātāja pienākums pierādīt papildu informācijas nepieciešamību regresa prasības ietvaros
In the first ten months of this year, the Department of Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court (Senate) annulled or amended rulings of first instance courts and courts of appeal in more than half of cases examined. Furthermore, in two out of five annulled or modified rulings (38%) the errors in application of a punishment have been found as shows the statistics of the Supreme Court.
Discretional rights of the local government (municipality) in the organization of autonomous functions; Assessment of the decision of the local government(municipality) regarding the termination of the handover for use of immovable property without compensation; Obviously unfounded application for review of the legality of the termination of a public law contract
Correction of the punishment stipulated in the minutes of an agreement proceedings
Rendering of a new judgment in the appellate instance court
Obligation of the insurer to prove the necessity of additional information within the framework of the subrogation actions
