Judicial Ethics Commission

The print version

The Judicial Ethics Commission is judicial self-government institution, which provides opinion on interpretation and violations of norms of ethics and explains norms of judicial ethics 

 

Basis of authority:

 

Composition

  • Composed of 10 members: two from among nominated by judges of Land Registry offices, three – from among nominated by judges of district (city) courts, three – from among nominated by judges of regional courts, and two – from among nominated by judges of the Supreme Court  
  • Elected for four years at the Judges’ Conference
  • Current composition (elected on 20 and 23 May 2016)

Dzintra AMERIKA – the judge of the Department of Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court  

Madara ABELE – the judge of Riga district court, d.d. of a judge of Riga regional court

Inara JAUNZEME – the judge of Jurmala court house of Riga district court

Anita KOVALEVSKA– the judge of the Administrative regional court (elected on 12 September 2014)

Baiba LIELPETERE – the judge of Land Registry office of Cesis district court

Guntars PLORINS – the judge of Valmiera court house of the Administrative district court

Normunds SALENIEKS - the judge of the Department of Civil Cases of the Supreme Court  

Dace SKRAUPLE – the judge of Zemgale regional court

Alla SILOVA– the judge of Latgale regional court, the Chair of the Judicial Panel of Civil Cases

Agnese SKULME– the judge of Land Registry office of Riga city Vidzeme suburb court

 

Functions of the Judicial Ethics Commission

  • Upon request of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and Chairs of courts, the Minister of Justice, the Judicial Disciplinary Committee or the disciplinary Court, provides opinion regarding interpretation and violations of norms of ethics
  • Upon its initiative or request of judges,  explains and analyses norms of the Code of Judicial Ethics and consults judges on issues related to judicial ethics
  • Compiles and prepares for publication conclusions and explanations on interpretation and application of norms of ethics  
  • Discusses violations of norms of ethics
  • Elaborates norms of the Code of Judicial Ethics and submits them for approval at the Judges’ Conference  

 

Decisions

  • The Judicial Ethics Commission may decide on initiation of a disciplinary case
  • Opinions of the Judicial Ethics Commission may not be appealed

 

 

 

 

Accessibility of information

  • Sittings of the Commission are open. With permission of the Commission, having received consent of a judge, whose possible violation of norms of ethics will be reviewed, and of filer of a request, individuals present may fix course of a sitting using audio or video equipment   
  • Upon motivated request of a person entitled to participate in the sitting or proposal of the Commission’s member, the issue may be reviewed in the closed sitting
  • Conclusions and explanations by the Judicial Ethics’ Commission regarding interpretation and explanation of norms of ethics are published on courts’ web site

 

More information on Judicial Ethics Commission

 

Communication with media:

Court Administration: Vjaceslavs Mitnicuks, International relations specialist: +371 26447901, vjaceslavs.mitnicuks@ta.gov.lv